Magnetism

Release [2.8]


Preface
What is magnetism?
The Neutron and the Strong Force
Decoupling or splitting the Electron and Proton magnetic fields
Using Nuclear spin to decouple the flows
How does this effect gravity?
Materials
Comparing other devices
The Scalar Bismuth Coil
Hamel Cones
Expiermental Device - Aluminum Splitter
Device 2 - The Nuclear Magnetic Resonant Battery
Magnets Dropped Through an Aluminum Tube
Searl Disc
Device 3 Simplicity
Notes and NMR References:
Definitions:
Reference constants and formulas:

[It may be helpful to scan the definitions at the bottom of the article, as well as consider the references on NMR for a mental picture]



Preface

Magnetism has been studied for centuries and almost from the beginning seemingly wild claims as to its importance have been stated. As I too have now studied magnetism it becomes much more obvious that as the 2nd most powerful force we have discovered, these claims may not be so inaccurate. My studies have led me all the way into quantum physics at the smallest measurable places where this force is detected. My surprise is what Leedskin and many of the others have been pointing towards, that magnetism is actually two forces working in harmony. More specifically four forces. It may very well be that in the splitting of these magnetic flows lies the [Source] of free energy.

Engineering magnetism at the atomic level is the only piece we are missing at present. The needed mathematical relationships must be converted to useful formulas to accomplish this for each device considered.


What is magnetism?

At the roots of magnetism, within the atom, we discover 4 different sources which can result in a magnetic flow external to the atom itself. Magnetism is a force linked to 4 separate forms of spin at the atomic level.

1 - Proton Particle Spin             [42.5781 Mhz / Tesla] NMR

2 - Proton Orbital Spin              [around 2 Mhz / Tesla] NMR

3 - Electron Particle Spin           [28.025 Ghz / Tesla] ESR       [Reversed component from Proton]  

4 - Electron Orbital Spin            [around 12 Ghz / Tesla] ESR

The 4 types of spin are all very different and distinct. In the normal magnetic field all these spins are setting in alignment and create basically one polarized magnetic field, in which the Proton is the dominant force in weight [mass is 1836 times higher]. However the Electron has a magnetic moment around  658.2106881 times the Proton. In a coherent magnetic field with both a Proton and an Electron it should be noted that the electron is spinning the opposite direction of the Proton. It's particle momentum is reversed from its magnetic field. When combined within a Neutron this becomes important, as well as establishing an orbital repulsion.

In the non magnetized atoms these spins are distributed such that none align consistently as they orbit the atom. In the atoms of Iron Cobalt and Nickel these spins come into alignment enough to create a coherent flow. In Iron the Electron shell is magnetic and the Nucleus is not. In Cobalt both are magnetic. In Copper only the Proton shell is magnetized and the Electron shell is not. 

As an atomic particle spins, its motion contains two different yet linked spin properties.

Angular momentum [the spin of mass]

Magnetic moment [the magnetic field]

The method in which atomic particles interact is through the charge of the particle, the magnetic field spin coupling, and the strong force

Charge:

Charge is a voltage potential. It attracts Electrons to Protons and it is completely balanced in Neutrons. An inverse distance squared force, reaches further out then Magnetism. Charge causes attraction or repulsion, and the result of a complete attraction creates a Neutron from a Proton [plus charge] and an Electron [minus charge] merging.

Magnetism:

Magnetism is an inverse distance cubed force. It is bipolar in any one magnet having a North and South.When Electron and Proton combine to form a Neutron the Electrons magnetism wins slightly, and the Neutron still has a very small negative magnetic moment. The atoms particles all have a magnetic field, as they move about they wobble or precess at some frequency. The Electron, Proton, and Neutron can be thought of as little spinning magnets, spinning in a dual cone shaped pattern, that may spread wider or narrower depending on the frequency and magnetic field they sit inside.

Spin Coupling:

This is a hard force to conceptualize, but can be easily grasped if holding a magnet next to a fast spinning copper cylinder. The spin of mass is not coupled by a charge, spin is coupled through a magnetic field crossing Electrons and Protons. In the spinning copper cylinder experiment, it does not matter which direction the magnets poles are pointing, as soon as its magnetic field crosses through the spinning copper the force is felt in the magnet. The two forces felt are "Spin Coupling" or "Inertial coupling" and "Magnetism" acting between the Copper and the Magnet. The Copper is a "Proton magnet," and the magnet is an "Electron magnet." The experiment shows why Electrons do not crash into the Nucleus of atoms. As you bring the magnet closer to the spinning Copper you feel the reverse magnetic force that results from the spin coupling. It pushes the magnet away, and also tries to drag it along at an orbital distance, as well as spin it backwards as it orbits. The only thing missing in this experiment is the attracting voltage that would cause the magnet to begin orbiting the spinning cylinder like an Electron orbiting the Nucleus. If released the magnet will be shot off at high speed and hit the wall. So we see that as Electrons orbit the Nucleus it does not matter which way their magnetic poles turn they are still repelled by diamagnetism.

In physics it is called inertial momentum. It is only recognized and labeled, but there has been little understanding of how this force is coupled between the different layers of the orbitals from proton to electron layers, which is easily observed in the spining copper cylinder experiments.

Spining Cylinder Experiment

Strong Force:

This is the force operating inside the Nucleus area of the atom which effects gravity. It is 137 times stronger then the Electromagnetic forces, and manifests a strong attraction or sucking inwards of the Nuclear particles. The periodic table shows us that all the parts within the nucleus weigh more when removed [compare atomic weight to Proton Neutron Electron counts]. The Nucleus is converting mass to energy.

These are the forces that we have to work with for engineering AG and ZPE devices. Mainly the first three can be used in device designs but it is probably the last one that we need to reach into for a mass into energy effect.

Angular momentum [spin of mass] is linked to the mass or weight of a particle and determines the particles power to effect other matter. However it is only through the EM or magnetic field that this energy can be transferred beyond the Proton layer. The magnetic field is the agent by which the momentum is transferred. Each of the particles involved has a "charge," as well as a "magnetic precession of spin." The Proton has 1836 times the mass of the electron, but exactly the same size charge, only positive rather than negative.

Proton charge e = 1.602 x 10 ^ -19 coulombs

Electron charge -e = -1.602 x 10 ^ -19 coulombs

The motion of [particle] spin is how the charge becomes two of the magnetic fields.

Protons magnetic dipoles precess around 42.5781 Mhz / Tesla

Electrons magnetic dipoles precess around 28.025 Ghz / Tesla

The motion of [Orbital] spin is the other method. Magnetic dipole precessional frequency ranges were mentioned previously for the other two fields.

As a particle spins it couples energy in three EM methods:

Its [electrical charge] is seen to reach out as an inverse distance squared force. This force is divergent in all directions.

Its [magnetic field] is seen to reach out as an inverse distance cubed force. This is a raw force of dipole magnetism independent of frequency of precession. It is caused by the electron traversing a circle at .999999... the speed of light, and spinning a reverse direction, as it does. The Proton doing similar yet with a like direction of spin as orbit.

Its [RF field] is seen to absorb and radiate photons at its NMR or ESR frequency as a little point source of RF or microwave energy. This is a link between magnetisms dipole [precession frequency] and the photons frequency.

This interaction has the capacity to flip the dipole completely over increasing its energy by placing the magnetic moment in opposition, and the angular momentum in an aiding state with all opposite particles in the field. The only way that both magnetic polarized states could be stable is if there are a combination of 4 forces, 1 is always in opposition to the other 3. The forces at work here are magnetic polarity of the Proton in its orbital, magnetic polarity of the Electron in its orbital, Proton angular momentum, and Electron angular momentum.

Because the RF frequency is a function of the surrounding magnetic field strength, the particles may interact across a wide band of RF EM spectrum. That of electrons, reaching far in excess of there natural microwave range as well as far below, if they are removed from the atom as with an electric arc.

The important differences:

The Proton is seen as a magnetic dipole spinning 1 Mhz  to 400 Mhz. Protons are seen as heavy or massive particles compared with Electrons. The Protons orbital motions are seen spewing out Mhz frequencies depending on the atoms they are inside which lay ~1000 times lower in frequency then the Electrons. The Protons g-Factor is seen at 5.5, meaning when Protons orbital and particle motion are combined the resulting magnetic moment is 5.5 times stronger then either alone. This brings the Protons magnetic moment up by a factor of five to around [7.878 ·10-26 J/T]. The Protons particle and Orbital motions fall in the same direction. The 2 magnetic fields generated from these two motions are coupled at the atomic level, and normally no external fields ever enter the atom strong enough to realign or break the coupling apart. They are seen as one complex motion magnetically in alignment, the result of two different spin frequencies, both in the Mhz region. Thus if we tilt the orbital field we also tilt the particle field.

The Electron is seen spinning in the 28 Ghz region. Thats about 1000 times faster then the Proton. Its mass or weight is seen as very small compared to Protons [mp / me = 1836.152701] , yet the net electric charge is identical only reversed in value. The Electrons g-Factor is about 2, meaning that when its orbital and particle spins are coupled they add up to twice the magnetic moment [ -1856.9 ·10-26 J/T]. These two spins are magnetically coupled as well and would both tilt together if suspended in a gas form. However in solid or liquid forms, electron orbits are fairly stationary forming bonds with other atoms. 

These two relationships are what may give us the ability to split the fields:

Magnetic Moment - Electron / Proton - Ratio: Ue / Up = 658.2106881

Mass - Proton / Electron - Ratio: 1836.152

The Electrons particle spin is seen in reverse of its orbital spin however, and this presents a very special case for a particle creating a magnetic field. The two magnetic fields are seen one winding around inside the other in reverse direction such that the particles momentum ends up reversed of its magnetic moment. This creates the particle of opposite effects when coupling to the Protons magnetic field. Electron particle spin is reversed of Proton particle spin if both are in the same magnetic field.

In a magnet these 4 spins all fall into alignment because over all they effect one another and loosely couple to one another orbitally yet tightly couple within particle orbital paths of each one. There are two kinds of magnetic alignment between these particles, and within NMR studies we see the differences. An orbital spin that receives excess energy through photon absorption, takes a spiral path and flips its motion completely over, reversing its N / S  polarity. Normally when orbital spin flips, particle spin does also as the two are coupled together. To cause these two spins to decouple takes a very strong magnetic field far in excess of anything we could hope to accomplish in our garage. The energy is lowest when the magnetic moment is aligned with the external magnetic field.

The EM field of atoms:

So here we see a picture where the Nucleus is hanging suspended inside the Electron shell attracted by charge and repelled in a cushion of magnetism, and coupled by spin through the magnetic field. The Nucleus a large mass with a small magnetic coupling, free to be flipped around by external magnetic fields which effect the momentum of the atom the greatest. As the electron orbitals are normally locked in place by chemical bonding or crystal structure, after magnetization they are pretty solid. Held in place by a much stronger magnetic force and far less actual mass.

As particles communicate through ESR and NMR they do so between "like" particles. Electrons may send photons that will not interact with Protons and also the reverse is true, yet each will exchange photon energy with their neighbors. Electron and Proton magnetic fields will tend to precess around the same vector, only flipping there alignment between two stable states. In both alignments 1 force of the 4 is always acting in opposition. An atom with a high nuclear spin will function very well at spreading NMR between atoms, as will a paramagnetic atom will with ESR. 

Coherent Matter:

Within matter at the core of all atoms, the nucleus, is setting the major mass of the atom. It is spinning, it also may have a magnetic field. In most normal matter the directions of spin is not aligned and will tend to cancel. Coherent matter is seen where the spinning mass of all atoms are moving in sync or in the same spin plane. Their is another synchronization possible with a magnetic nucleus as well, where all magnetic dipoles are spinning in sync. This would result in a synchronous spinning magnetic field.  In an object at rest, this coherent spin of mass may not be perceptible. It is only when we set this object in motion that we would observe anything unusual. If we can couple to this spinning weight and manipulate it, possibly we can cause device rotation, as well as bring Nuclear energies outwards.Coherent matter is where one or more of these atomic qualities are coupled across a great many atoms and they all begin to act as one with respect to at least one force. Magnetic, vibrational, electric, or mass rotation planar angle of spin.

Nuclear Mass rotation:

It should also be noted that it is possible to rotate almost the entire weight of a material like copper  by magnetically spinning its Nucleus. If a great many of the Nucleus's of atoms can be set into a coherent spin plane of momentum, then tilting this momentum spin plane is the equivalent of  tilting a fast spinning fan. If you hold an electric fan straight outwards, blowing away from you, then quickly tilt it downwards, you will realize the importance of this principle. It generates a rotational torque that tries to spin you around on your feet. This mechanism of tilting a spinning mass by rotating the spin plane applied at the Nucleus of atoms would impart about 95% of the mass of the material into a torque. This is very possibly why an induction motor is seen to turn in a rotating magnetic field. Copper setting in a rotating magnetic field will align its nuclear spin to the field, rotating the field will rotate the angular momentum of the mass of the copper atoms much like the fan in the above illustration. The spin momentum will sit at 90 degrees to the poles of the field.  In the Roshin and Godin disc we see the horizontal magnets pulling the nucleus very quickly to one side, then releasing them to slowly return to vertical. During the fast tilt at 12 or more points along the cylinder this is causing an induction motor effect for a quarter of a rotation. If the spin momentum is strong enough the nucleus may continue to spin on around due to its own momentum. If the iron in the Searl disc is imprinted with a sine wave at the NMR frequency of copper, times the number of rollers, then here we might see one reason the device would both spin the momentum of nucleus into motion as well as reach a level of coherent matter. As we slide along the side of the Searl disc cylinder, we would see a spinning magnetic field imprinted over the vertical static field.

If we spin the copper nucleus magnetically, we get a physical torque. If we increase the frequency of magnetic spin so it hits the NMR frequency or a lower harmonic, which is the natural mass vibration rate, we may see a point where the nucleus begins to add energy to the momentum from its normal spiraling flipping motion. Coupling photon absorbed energy into physical spin. 


The Neutron and the Strong Force:

As we put the nucleus together, its weight does not equal the sum of its parts. The force existing as the "Strong Force" holding the nucleus together is removed from the atomic weight as a subtracted mass. Add up the weight of all the Protons and Neutrons, then subtract the gluon force converted to mass by E=MC^2. The weight is always less. The mass that is lost in the resultant atomic weight of the nucleus is the strong force or energy. The strong force is a sucking inwards of all particles inside the Nucleus. It draws them inwards.

Here we see a direct conversion of mass into binding energy. When the Strong force operates on the nucleus particles it reduces their mass by a finite amount.
This seems to be the first level where gravity is naturally altered within the atom. This may be where it can be controlled.

Classically three kinds of energy were identified that can come out of the nucleus, Alpha, Beta, and Gamma radiation. Either from parts exiting the nucleus as Helium and being expelled, or from orbital jumps to a lower energy level inside the nucleus. This is called nuclear energy and is far stronger then electron generated energy. Also the gluon energy is stronger then magnetism but only operates at a very short distance from the particle vortexes. This may give a clue as to how the particle vortexes work. Any atoms with more then 83 Protons are too big to remain stable and slowly fall apart over time. Their nucleus decays. Bismuth is the largest stable atom. How is it we can get two particles close enough together for the gluon force to grab them? Why does this process cause a weight loss?

Getting 2 Protons and an Electron together in a stable link to form a Nucleon, where the oppositely spinning vortexes overlap one another in the Neutron is amazing indeed. It requires reducing the force that holds them apart. Both are charged oppositely and so attract Yet the magnetic fields are opposite of spin momentum in each one.

Orbital structure of an atom:

Electron and Proton naturally attract from voltage [Fig 1]. When they sit in a magnetic field they both spin opposite directions. However as they come closer the spin of momentum coupling overcomes the magnetic field attraction. As we see in copper induction experiments, momentum is coupled through the magnetic field without being effected by the polarity of the magnetic field.  Electron and Proton flip into a magnetic opposition [Fig 2], aligning their momentum vectors and a balance point is reached where voltage is pulling and magnetism is pushing. This can be achieved either vertically as pictured or laying broadside as in the Searl disc. We now have the electron cloud forming at some distance from the Proton shell. Indeed we see these two particle magnetic fields as very different, and this may be why matter does not simply disappear as we combine Proton and Electron. This pattern would seem to be of a scalar opposing nature magnetically at the orbital level. This may explain why the electron does not crash into the Nucleus, but why does it circle in an orbit? This answer may lie within the quantum physics model. As the Electron is only appearing at quantum intervals, and also spinning, the effect of this spinning pulsating force would be seen as wheel gears, turning against the ones the Proton is emitting. Talk about "Searl disc" similarity. These two spinning opposite directions with all the weight in the Proton, the Electron is hurled around the Nucleus at near lightspeeds. No more senseless talk about momentum type orbital paths in a frictionless space, this is all electromagnetic and powered from the spin of the Particle vortexes winking on and off as they cross this density.
Electron and Proton combine to form a Neutron

The Neutron:

If quadrature alignment is reached [Fig 3] then Electron and Proton can merge [Fig 4] to become a Neutron [Fig 5]. The two forces of spin and magnetism setting at 90 degrees, the electric force pulls the particles together and overlapping. A beta energy particle is exchanged, and one quark flips.  At this point their momentum swings back into perfect alignment, canceling voltage and almost all the magnetic forces from radiating [Fig 5]. [The Neutron still has a magnetic dipole moment of -1.913 Un. and there is a technology called Neutron scattering using its Larmor frequency as well, around 1 Gig]. When they are still setting at 90 degrees only the voltage vector is interacting [fig 4], the spin and magnetic vectors have not yet recoupled. It is between these two last steps where we may find the method of tapping the energy of Source.

As a Neutron they have become a scalar canceling device, falling into a momentum locked position with spins aligned. Interesting to note that only in this configuration do they now appear to have an attracting magnetic field, an attracting Voltage, and spin alignment. This unique alignment with one inside the other. This could be likened to a short circuit at the source generation point for the EM field. They are as close as they can get to all attractive forces. Both alter their size, the resultant Neutron size lies between Electron and Proton. A new force emerges in holding these together,  and becomes the Strong Force coming now out of the Neutron just a little, sucking all the Nucleus together and altering the weight of the particles setting inside it. We now see a particle with a high mass and a weak magnetic field.  The two tornadoes of Source "merging" as the strong force.

The Nucleon:

If the Electron and Proton were to merge perfectly they would overlap exactly and completely cancel out one another, a total short circuit. This is very probably the instable state for a Neutron, a state of perfect alignment and may be what will cause it to fly apart. The presence of the extra Proton setting next to the Neutron in the Nucleon attracts the Electron outwards and pushes the inner Proton inwards [see fig 5]. In this state the Neutron is stable and can exist in all matter. If we were to increase the negative potential around this atom it would tend to push the Neutron closer towards this state. The higher Electron count would pull on the Neutrons inner Proton and it would push on the Neutrons internal Electron, making the Neutron less stable.

When the Neutron is removed from the Nucleus it will find itself setting in a more negatively charged field, if not entirely surrounded by the Electron shells of other atoms. To stay together it is noted that one Proton must be close enough to maintain a dominant Positive voltage with a dominant Proton spin. This forms the Nucleon.

If the Neutron is removed from the atom it will decay within 10.3 minutes back into a Proton and an Electron plus a Beta energy packet and a quark flip. Here we see a weight gain as well as an extra energy gain as they come apart.  This is a surprise because we were taught that "energy in" must equal "energy out." A Neutron will dismantle itself outside the atom, giving off energy as it becomes heavier. How can a Neutron falling apart, both gain weight, and emit energy? So here we see a greater output then the sum of the parts with respect to Neutrons exiting the atom and exiting the Strong Force area.
The Neutron only produces the Strong Force when setting next to another Proton in a Nucleon. As a combined particle, the Neutron is only slightly larger then the Proton, and about half as large as an Electron. 

Neutrons are not stable and can be manipulated, as the surrounding Protons keep them stable by providing spin coupling through the strong force as well as positive voltage potential and a weak magnetic force. This would tend to push the Neutrons inner Electron and Proton inwards closer to center of spin. The Electrons orbiting also effect them because their magnetic field is far greater then the Protons and it is opposing so also pushes inwards. This causes the Neutron to become smaller then the Electron alone and pushes it towards a higher density. This may actually be what alters gravity and the Neutron may be the particle that is the link to other densities. Here at the Nucleus all the known forces would seem to come together.

Momentum of spin - Electric - Magnetic - Scalar - Strong Force - Gravity

The Neutron can be viewed as a very close configuration of the same Electron and Proton particles we have dealt with in their Orbital positions. The close bond is one that is barely in balance within the atom, and comes apart if removed from the atom. It is very likely that we can effect this close relationship to extract energy from Source by developing a process of partially splitting the two while still inside the Nucleus. If we can toggle between Fig 4 and Fig 5 without destroying the Neutron.

Notes:
[An electron shell may form around Copper or Aluminum with its Proton magnetic field synchronized through all the atoms to become strong enough to repel the electrons magnetic field if induction is operating. A strong Proton generated magnetic field should act like the nucleus of an atom, if charged positively. The charge can be induced into the coppers electron shell but the magnetic field must come from the nucleus. Protons may orbit a negatively charged magnet as well.]

[Here we see that to produce the strongest possible Proton magnetic field, would require a material like Copper or Aluminum be charged positive. Then Protons aligned through NMR resonance into the same plane of spin. Hitting the system at 90 degrees with a strong electron generated magnetic field, we see the fields separating in the Neutrons, and tapping the strong force. This is the force that is shown to alter gravity right on the periodic table. This is also a force that is based on the two constants of spin found in the Electron and Proton which can never be depleted.]

Atomic force breakdown:

Strong force - Overlaps all the Nucleus and particles inside it - [Neutron + Proton = Nucleon] [Effects mass or gravity lowering weight]
EM - Works mainly from the Protons outwards and overlaps Protons and Electrons, however within the Neutron there may be scalar canceling EM of the highest magnitude possible, where both forces are seen to create torsion or time at their closest distance.
Gravity -  Seen as a constant force across all the particles, however at the nucleus within the strong force it is lower then the sum of all the parts outside the Nucleus.

[The Proton is seen as the Particle that seems to sit within both forces, interacting with complexity in both fields.]
[When a Neutron comes apart, breaking back into a Proton and Electron, it emits energy, as it leaves the Nucleus it gains weight]


Decoupling or splitting the Electron and Proton magnetic fields:

[The 90 degree tilt, reaching a new stable state between Proton and Electron fields, Quadrature magnetization.]

If we succeed at creating two magnetic fields setting at 90 degrees to one another where Protons align to precess around one, and Electrons align around the other, we could expect magnets to saturate along these two 90 degree angles as more atoms take on this alignment forming longer chains. We could also expect that the transmition of ESR and NMR energies would become polarized along such a 90 degree relationship as photons jump between atoms. Further the hint from the Searl disk that high voltages may accompany each field of the polarity following the particle generating the field. When the forces of EM no longer cancel within atoms and begin to appear at the edges of the material, we can expect a lot of energy to become present.


Two natural states of alignment between Electron and Proton magnetism:

State one: [The low energy state]

The magnetic moments are aligned - The angular momentum is opposing

State Two: [The high energy state]

The magnetic moment is opposing - The angular momentum is aligned

Either state sets at least one force in opposition to the other three.

Once the electron shell is bonded into a solid, the Proton field normally takes on one of these two states, precessing around it, unless a higher magnetic field becomes present at another angle moving through it.

Splitting the fields

We see the magnetic field strongest off the ends of a dipole magnet and weakest off its sides. If we can place the blotch wall of each of the fields exactly over the strongest field of the other, we will get the greatest decoupling between the two fields spin planes. In this state the two fields will become the least interactive and should split.  If a magnet becomes linked in a long chain of magnets, its interaction to others fields decreases. The magnetic interaction is strongest off the ends of a long run of magnets and near the center of the string it is very weak. You can show this with 2 very long chains of magnets, which if held together at the center, do not show any sign of effecting one another. Yet through each one is traveling a very strong flow and upon reaching the end of the magnet it jumps out to interact. A string of Neo disc magnets stacked to a foot and a half long,  can be placed between two tables and will exhibit great strength at staying together. Upon placing it centered over another stack crossing at 90 degree angles, the two centers can be touched and moved apart and will neither attract nor repel. It is only where the magnet strings ends come together where we get strong interactions. Once quadrature magnetization is established over a certain distance we might expect it to be self sustaining.



In splitting we need to offer the string ends a good termination point. We want an Electron based magnetic field crossing a Proton based field at 90 degrees. Then we want to force the Protons and Electrons in our material to shift, chaining into the field that is operating at its like spin properties. All we have to separate them is the difference of weight, magnetic moment, and magnetic dipole precession frequency. 

 If we have achieved quadrature alignment at the EM layer then its force should be felt at the strong force layer as well hopefully effecting the Neutron.

Using a magnetic material to split the fields:

One possible method [cobalt magnets]:

Since the Electrons 2 magnetic fields are usually fairly locked in during magnetization in a permanent magnet, if we position part of it horizontally and part vertically, then as we add momentum to the disc our Protons in the horizontal plane will want to align vertically. If we then coax them using another slightly weaker magnet at 90 degrees [vertical], they should tilt vertical and begin to precess around it, at some RPM where the momentum of the Proton begins to exceed its weaker magnetic holding force. This static state where both particles are at 90 degree magnetization is the one that may begin to cause relativistic alterations at the Neutron layer. This could be as simple as two magnets carefully aligned on both sides of a cylinder wall. At some critical velocity the field would split in the horizontally polarized magnet.

Another method of causing momentum in a magnetic disc:

If we simply place many stronger magnets at 90 degrees with moving intersecting fields such that we cause the Protons to all spin one direction along many points around the cylinder, we are effectively creating small rotating gyros. As we spin them through a 90 degree spin to the cylinders outer surface they will all impart a momentum to turn the disc. This is possible because nearly all the mass of an atom is in the nucleus, and it is the nucleus that will be spinning. You can show this principle by holding a fast turning bicycle wheel on its axis, while setting on a swivel chair. As you roll the wheel one direction in front of you, perpendicular to spin, one hand moves up as the other moves down, your chair will start to turn. While this method should be able to start a disc into motion it will not split the fields totally unless it spins them at 90 degrees to the primary magnetic field, yet it will create a small time interval where blotch walls pass at 90 degrees which may cause a smaller effect, but certainly not a complete saturation. This would appear however to be a rotating magnetic field at the nuclear level.

Using a non magnetic material to split the fields:

In a non magnetic solid material the electron orbitals are locked by chemical bonding and crystalline structures, however they are not magnetic. A material like Aluminum or Copper will need to be magnetized along its electron orbitals by passing a steady current through them one direction or laying them next to magnetized materials, if we are to couple them to the Neutrons inner Electron vortex. This will create a grouping of electrons along the correct spin planes simulating a magnetic atom. Both of these materials have a high nuclear spin so the Protons will be effected by both magnetic field and momentum. The key to this method will be to create the proper magnetization in the Copper horizontally, which will turn the electron orbitals into little magnets creating the 90 degree field. A second vertical magnetic field must be present slightly lower to capture the Protons as the higher momentum of the disc begins to tilt them vertical.

This method could be used by sheeting a vertically polarized magnet with Copper or Aluminum or even wrapping it with a coil as a torrid. It could also be done with only copper coils. Either way it will still have to be spun up to reach the threshold where Protons tilt vertical and Electrons stay horizontal. As this process is happening within the copper atoms, all can be started with DC currents. If it is desired to do this without spinning the disc, using only copper coils then some method of entraining the Protons with an NMR frequency may prove effective. The energy in the NMR would have to exceed the threshold of the difference of the two coils field strength. This would add a third coil pulsing the NMR frequency in the correct plane to tilt Protons towards the weaker field.

The Searl disc may be using many of these methods at different RPMs.

 

The [avalanche] effect

 [bringing the micro effect to the macro world]

As we start this interaction in one small area of the device, it may be hard to envision how it can spread to envelope the entire disc, as well as effect surrounding matter. This is explained in the coupling between atoms setting next to one another as the two magnetic fields begin to increase in strength from the decoupling and from greater numbers of protons lining up in the new field. One of the methods of energy transfer between adjacent atoms is NMR, however this method is in fact frequency dependent. This means that as some of the Protons begin to tip to 90 degrees, their field in this direction becomes stronger. They will also radiate photons of the correct energy to effect nearby Protons tending to tilt them into alignment. These photons will be ignored by the Electrons which have a frequency about 1000 times higher. As new Protons get hit with NMR photons they will begin to flip into a spiral path towards reversing to 180 degrees. As they cross the new 90 degree magnetic field some will be trapped by it and begin to precess around it instead of continuing there flip. The Protons will all begin to seek the new alignment as time progresses, particularly if their NMR energy level is high overall. The Electrons will have a similar process tending to strengthen the horizontal magnetic field and holding them even tighter with the reinforced ESR energy oscillating between atoms in the plane at 90 degrees to the Proton energy. Also as the unpaired Neutron within Copper begins to split its magnetic field, the strong force will release energy, and the Electrons magnetic field will pop out aiding the polarization. As the process continues it may at some point become self sustaining, and spread beyond the 90 degree magnets of the device all through the entire system if configured correctly to allow this.

Two magnetic fields aligned at 90 degrees and building towards light speed unity. Particle velocity should speed up but never actually hit light speed, because the magnetic field is not perfectly dipole in nature. There is always some magnetic field off the sides of a dipole, however as frequency raises the tilt angles of NMR and ESR narrow, as the precession frequency raises, and far less energy will appear off the sides of the dipoles. This may push electrons into a high enough frequency to begin to radiate light. Thus the glow.

This describes a runaway condition we see in the devices studied. The better we succeed at splitting the B fields of Proton and Electron the faster the device may runaway. We can either attempt to slow the acceleration effect using very thin cylinders, or we can counter it with a method of reuniting the fields. Either way it must be accomplished within the device at the atomic layer before the device crosses the density threshold of 3rd density and vanishes.

Using Nuclear spin to decouple the magnetic flows:

In studying NMR technology it becomes apparent there is another method of decoupling Electron and Proton fields, at least temporarily. When one hits the atom at 90 degrees with a 1/4 wave NMR pulse, the Proton field tilts to 90 degrees then slowly recovers, sometimes taking several seconds to stabilize back into alignment as it spins back up through a spiral path. With this splitting method the Proton field can be kept in a state of  equator spin around the standing magnetic field. If a constant supply of pulses are fed to the material keeping Protons spinning then this alignment may be enough to alter the Neutrons. A standing magnetic field must flow through the material in the vertical plane, then pulses are added at 90 degrees in an attempt to keep Protons spinning on equatorial paths. If the pulses are hitting at properly timed intervals this method may be useful for thin materials such as cylinders or spinning cylinders. No DC holding field is possible for Proton alignment as it must be free to spin, so pulses must be kept constant, strong, and very short in duration, preferably four times the NMR frequency, or 1/4 wave pulses spaced exactly several wavelengths apart. Or a lower frequency wave form changing at the exact times to intersect these pulses edges. No stable quadrature magnetization could be expected to support itself in this method however it may be much easier to achieve if one uses good electronics designs.  A formula for device cylinder spin, and pulse frequency could be set up to cover almost the entire surface of a disc with pulses before Protons can complete their realignment. This would establish a large enough area on the cylinder to generate high voltages between its outer and upper surfaces.

An AC holding field may be possible by setting up a rotating magnetic field at the NMR frequency around a thin material like a sphere or cylinder, with two iron core electromagnets above and below it. An iron core could even be placed through the center of the cylinder to transmit the DC magnetic field constantly along the Aluminum or Copper surface on the inner side. Are we starting to look like a Searl disk yet? The beauty of this design is that if we remove the pulses the effect should cease. If we decrease the intensity, then less atoms would tilt and a governor may be designed to regulate voltage output. Whether or not we achieve a total Nuclear resonance through the device would be hard to say, and experiment is in order. If the atoms stacked vertically on one another, do effect one another by magnetism and NMR energy this field may spread up and down the vertical  sections of the material causing all to spin in sync at some point.


How does this effect gravity?

Important to note here that it is a physics constant we may be effecting, that of Electron and Proton particle spin and relating to Planks constant. The Electron and Proton at their smallest points of spin in the Neutron may be the link to time and gravity, not so much the orbital motions. This is where we hit the wall of relativity as well as quantum physics. However since we gain control of their magnetically coupled orbital motions we have gained the ability to tilt them as well. This may be the link between the forces of EM and Gravity we have been looking for. As the Electrons momentum is less then 1/1000 the Protons this unlinking may seem of no consequence, however remember in a particle traveling at .999999... light speed this slight difference is magnified by a relativistic amount. Decoupling Electron and Proton Spin momentum may be the strongest effect we could hope for in this sense. Decoupling them inside the Neutron may effect time itself.

As the Protons motions are freed from the Electrons motions from the decoupling of the magnetic fields now setting at 90 degrees to one another, both particles would increase in frequency due to at least one countering force being decoupled. Previously when they both sat in an attracting field, their magnetic moment is alike but the angular momentum of each one is opposite in direction. In the Neutron they sit with momentum aligned and magnetic fields in a powerful opposition.  As the momentum is transferred across the magnetic field this would tend to lower angular momentum of both particles. As they decouple spin increases. If time is truly the increment of spin as Wilbert Smith has suggested then the overall time frame of the atom in this split configuration will speed up, approaching or exceeding the time flow rate of free space.

Time flow rate across an area of space is linked to the vector sum of all spin rates for all particle motions [Wilbert Smith]. And this is why the entire device as well as all surrounding mater within the corona become altered as device quadrature magnetic saturation is reached. The Searl disc shows us this phenomenon manifesting in a spherical area surrounding the device. Even dislodging the dirt in the ground if it is formed within it. At the corona appears a wall where time flow changes rather quickly, and this barrier may causes a torsion force that will rip matter apart.

When the time frame reaches an equal rate as free space we could expect the effected atoms to become weightless. This is a very small change in time flow rate and observed in the blue shift seen in the GPS satellite system. If there is enough energy in the interaction to push further then we could expect the object to become gravity repulsive and a push towards the next higher density. If the density threshold is crossed and the system then shut down, we may expect it to achieve the next higher stable state of matter, naturally landing it in the 4th density as the atoms fall back into normal alignment at the next higher frequency band. At this state it becomes totally invisible to 3rd density beings.

How much force must be applied to the Proton with its weaker magnetic field and higher mass to tilt it ?

The requirement is only that we have enough momentum of spin to tilt the Protons magnetic alignment from the stronger field into the weaker field. These two fields must cross at 90 degrees inside the atoms. If using a non magnetic substance for splitting, the 90 degree field will effect the electrons motions as well, so it must be kept as much weaker as possible, otherwise the electrons may begin to realign around it as well. It is very important to find the threshold point and no more where the Protons tilt. As the chemical bonding of these materials do not hold the magnetic field within their Electron structure. As the EM field moves into quadrature magnetism it will effect the Neutrons and begin to split them as well if encouraged with a high negative charge, effecting time and gravity.

With the cobalt magnets however, both fields could even be the same. As the orbitals are magnetic within the structure of the materials there is little chance they will demagnetize one another at the same Tesla rating. However with both fields the same it may become impossible to return them to their original state. They may tend to toggle randomly causing a chaotic condition. The best interaction will be if the momentum is used to cause the threshold switching, as then the maximum possible numbers of Protons will be under device control.

Forces that pull the Proton vertical:

Device spin, centrifugal force, mass, [aligned angular momentum] 

Vertical magnetic weaker field. NMR in the correct plane of motion.

Force Window:

The device spin [particle momentum I] must be calculated as to our [disc radius R] and our RPM [rotational velocity V] as an [energy value J]. It must be calculated to cross the threshold of [magnetic field coupling Bh ] in the horizontal plane and the added [energy J] must be enough to couple to the [magnetic field Bv ] in the vertical plane without crossing it. The parameters of [Disc Radius], [Disc Angular Velocity], and our two [magnetic fields Bv Bh] must be determined before we can expect a successful result.

These are the basic relationships that must be considered to arrive at a mathematical solution for initial startup.

 Neutron Splitting:

Getting the split EM field to penetrate to the Neutron layer requires more then just splitting at the Orbital layer of the atom. Neutrons come apart naturally when removed from the Nucleus. This includes a self tilting to decouple Electron and Proton enough to expel them back into magnetic repulsion states outside one another. One of the forces involved is charge. The Nucleus must have a high positive charge near the Neutron to keep it balanced. This is a force we can effect, and it is suggested that where a high - voltage builds up on a splitting material may be where Neutrons begin changing mass to energy.

Critical threshold:

It should be understood that this effect of new atomic alignment will manifest as a total quantity of the sum of all atoms attaining the new alignments, yet at some point these fields alone become strong enough to self radiate through the material of the device. Thus a different method of control must be accessed to reverse the process or control it. As well, the startup device must reach this critical threshold

The critical threshold will be the point where the Protons new magnetic field becomes strong enough to maintain its new alignment without the aid of our external magnets, and it begins to spread outside the domain of the magnets starting the process. There will be a minimum number of atoms involved in maintaining the 90 degree field outside the magnets inducing the effect. These atoms will be linked by the 90 degree magnetic field the sum of all atoms with electrons in alignment and the NMR energy moving between the atoms.

It becomes apparent that each material we consider using must be calculated differently. This is because the nuclear spin of all atoms is different. Some atoms do not have a nuclear magnetic field we can even couple to externally. Others have a very strong one. However it is interesting to note that even the ones that do not radiate far may look like opposing magnets setting in one alignment.

The magnetic moment of the Proton field is readily available on the NMR charts as "magnetic moment" for most all the elements. It represents a Joules/Tesla or J/T value.

Nuclear magnetic moment of only about 2% of Iron is .15696 , Copper is 2.87549, Nickel .96827 These numbers represent the magnetic field strength of the Protons magnetic force, they are different for each element and why NMR can be used to detect elements. The electron ESR is not so easy as finding it on a chart however. They must each be calculated based on the Proton field they sit within and the external magnetic field from outside the atom.

Control

The next most important issue after discovering the start up "critical threshold" is the control mechanism. With two magnetic fields manifest through our device, and two planes of  ESR / NMR exchanging energy between atoms, the only solution is to reattach the magnetic fields one atom at a time and try to control the quantity of atoms in each alignment. 

One method identified by Searl is to hit the device with a 28 to 29 Mhz RF fields. This should tend to send Protons into an NMR flipping motion of a higher energy state where as they rotate or flip they cross the electron 90 degree field becoming trapped in it once again for a time. The time this can last can be over one second as NMR has a time lag. While tilted back they will no longer add to device spin.

 This frequency will have to be device dependent based on the material in effect and the standing magnetic field present. It could be something as simple as two resonant coils setting vertically and horizontally with a switch to electrically couple them. It would absorb NMR from one spin plane and then transmit it into the other, causing the Proton field to tilt as NMR interactive photons are radiated in the wrong plane dispersing Proton alignments. This would only work if NMR resonance is consistent across the device strong enough to couple to one of the coils. If it is not then an external transmitter must be used only hitting the band close enough to effect NMR flips. This transmitter must be located within the system such that it does not loose the time frame of the device. So control may become a balance of controlling the NMR energy between the two polarized planes within the device. Note this system is separate from the startup system, which can not be expected to control the process once started.

 

Materials:

In the selection of materials it is noteworthy to identify a few very basic qualities of the atoms we are working with and attempt to correlate the parameters to accomplish a method of engineering devices, down to magnetic force splitting into the Neutrons. 

Iron: The magnetic field in iron is mostly in its Electron layer. Of course the weight of iron is mostly setting in its Nuclear center which has a neutral magnetic field. When coupling a magnetic field through Iron almost none of the atoms weight or mass is effected in the least, [2% natural abundance]. As iron is magnetized, its chemical bonding connections are seen to roll with the external magnetic field setting up a new angle with other magnetic domains around it. The resistance to this force is linked only to the electron mass which is some 1800 times lower then its Nuclear mass, and its resistance to chemical bonding roll, and the temperature. A magnetic field generated from flowing current through Iron wire would be seen to have only an Electron generated field.

Copper: The magnetic field in copper is setting only in its Nucleus, attached to its weight or mass tightly, and able to roll if acted on by an outside magnetic field. Coppers electron shell is magnetically neutral. A magnetic field moving through copper is seen to couple to its "mass" and the Proton generated magnetic field will have to tilt the atoms weight as it changes angles. There will be a delay because of momentum during the tilting process as the weight will resist altering its spin angle. A magnetic field generated from flowing current through Copper wire would be seen to have both an Electron and a Proton generated field.

Aluminum: In Aluminum the Electron shell is also neutral, however it's Nuclear magnetic moment is higher then Copper. Although the mass of Aluminum is lower then copper the magnetic coupling is higher.

Silver: I added Silver here because it has almost as low a Nuclear spin as Iron. With Silver wire one can generate almost completely Electron generated fields. Due to the fact that Silver is a better conductor then copper, these qualities make it perfect for the ideal splitting device if one needs magnetic coils creating magnetic fields with almost no mass interactions.

Cobalt: In Cobalt we see that both electron layer and Nucleus have a magnetic field inherent within them. An external  magnetic field moving through cobalt will effect both. The electron shell is tightly bonded, so if tilting the Nucleus with a stronger magnetic field, it should decouple from the electron shell.

Effects: Effects that can be used to alter the free floating Nuclear Mass motions of materials are not limited to magnetism, or electric potential. Even though if you shake a block of copper atoms, it is the electromagnetic forces that keep the Nucleus centered and spinning, this force allows a flexibility to appear between the Proton and Electron shell. The Electron shell is extremely light by comparison to the Nucleus of an atom, but in solids the Electron shell is anchored into the structure bonds and its mass is far greater then one Nucleus. The Nuclear mass can be vibrated using many forms of energy.

Sound

Physical vibration

Moving magnetic field

A Vibrating voltage [Capacitance coupling]

Gravity

It should be noted that where the Electron Mass of a material comes into natural harmonic ratios with the Nuclear mass, a coupling of vibrational energy may be possible, if the material is suspended in a magnetic field and free to vibrate. [See section on Hamel Cones]

Quadrature magnetization:

If we wanted to produce a quadrature magnetization with the least amount of effort, it would seem the best material would be one known to have both a magnetized Electron shell, as well as a high nuclear spin to begin with. Of the three basic magnetic metals, Iron, Nickel, and Cobalt, Cobalt jumps out as the perfect candidate. We would expect that Cobalt would be the easiest material to create the effect in, as it naturally has both Proton and Electron magnetization. This is providing we can achieve a controlled separation of the two and align it to effect the Neutrons.

Moving towards metals that are non magnetic at the electron layer, we are now faced with causing them to become magnetized or placing them beside Electron magnetized materials like iron. The metals Copper and Aluminum jump out here as they are electric conductors and can be magnetized simply by passing current through them. If the current is passed vertically then a natural spin would manifest in the correct plane to align properly with our vertical magnetic field. The current would tend to tilt the electron fields exactly where we want them. We would still need the correct device spin to hold the Proton orbitals vertical, however now we have a device that may not need its 90 degree magnets at all. Simply wrap a magnetic cylinder with copper as a toroidal coil. Cylinder is magnetized  N/S vertical, the same direction we flow current through the wires. The Proton tilts should manifest within the copper wire. This explains a great many devices at this point, combining magnets and copper wire in such a method. Now we may find some ability to define the correct parameters.

[For reference here are a few elements]

Iron -

Specific gravity 7.87  [mass/volume]

Isotope 57

Symbol Fe

Name Iron

Spin 1/2

Natural Abund. 2.11900

Magnetic Moment 0.15696

Gamma (x 10^7rad/Ts) 0.86806

Quadrup.MomentQ/fm^2 ---

Frequency 1.379 Mhz

Reference Fe(CO)5

Iron is a natural material to use to place a magnetic field next to another material, however it will not be very useful as to splitting the magnetic fields . We see its natural abundance at 2%, this means we will get erratic results if any, as only 2% of its nuclear magnetic fields can be coupled to consistently with RF. There will be a very low amount of NMR jumping between atoms. Irons Nucleus would be impossible to align to a weaker field crossing at 90 degrees to its Electron field, and only device spin could do this. Iron would be best thought of as a magnetic conductor able to distribute the magnetic field in a constant manner along a better substance for doing the splitting.

 

Copper -

Specific gravity  8.95

Isotope 63

Symbol Cu

Name Copper

Spin 3/2

Natural Abund. 69.17000

% Receptivity (rel. to 13C) 0.06500

Magnetic Moment 2.87549

Gamma(x 10^7rad/Ts) 7.11179

Quadrup.MomentQ/fm^2 -22.00000

Frequency 11.290

Reference [Cu(CH3CN)4][ClO4]

Here we see copper is a better choice for splitting the fields. It's natural abundance falls into two different levels on the NMR chart. The most commonly found Isotope of copper is at 69% abundance [listed above]. It's next is found at 30% where we see a slightly higher NMR frequency. This means if we have a cylinder of copper built it may have one or probably both Isotopes found in varying degrees with two NMR frequencies present. Although copper is a good choice it is still a gamble and two sets of numbers will have to be followed assuming we will fall somewhere between them both. Copper is an excellent choice for coupling torsion from a magnetic field but may not be the best choice for splitting the magnetic fields consistently. Yet with a magnetic moment half that of Aluminum and a greater mass it may be far easier to accomplish with a wider force window. As copper is non magnetic at the electron layer, unless current is flowing through it, some form of current conduction will be necessary, or setting it very close to a magnetic material, to generate the horizontal field Bh [horizontal] . Current may have to constantly flow vertically through the material to magnetize it.

[The Searl disk is an example of the two Iron and Copper touching in a cylindrical method so as to make use of both]

Aluminum -

Specific gravity  2.7

Isotope 27

Symbol   Al

Name Aluminum

Spin 5/2

Natural Abund. % 100.00000

Receptivity(rel. to 13C) 0.20700

Magnetic Moment 4.30869

Gamma(x 10^7rad/Ts) 6.97627

Quadrup.MomentQ/fm^2 14.66000

Frequency 11.095 Mhz

Reference Al(NO3)3

Aluminum has a natural abundance  of 100 %. This means that we will get very consistent results across all the atoms of Aluminum as found in nature. Its nuclear magnetic moment is very high 4.3  making it easy to couple to the Protons magnetic field yet a little harder to tilt it. In a one Tesla field we can expect NMR to be operating around 11 Mhz consistently across all the atoms. Due to the high magnetic moment  of Aluminum,  we may run into a problem with RPM and the force window will be narrower. We will have to spin the disc around 2 times faster then a copper disc to break free of the horizontal field Bh. Another interesting note is that Copper and Aluminum lay very close to the same NMR frequency. Aluminum is not magnetic so it will be necessary to flow current through it to create field Bh if desired. It may also be necessary to support this field with 90 degree magnets because Aluminum is a poor conductor and creating a strong enough field to align Protons may be impossible without some external help.

Cobalt-

Specific gravity: 8.9

Isotope 59

Symbol    Co

Name Cobalt

Spin  7/2

Natural Abund. % 100.00000

Receptivity(rel. to 13C) 0.27800

MagneticMoment 5.24700

Gamma(x 10^7rad/Ts) 6.33200

Quadrup.MomentQ/fm^2 42.00000

Frequency 10.103

Reference K3[Co(CN)6]

Amazingly cobalt seems to offer all the needed parameters . 100% abundance, high weight, high magnetic moment, plus it is paramagnetic, magnetized along the electron shell as well as at the nucleus. With this material we could be certain that both magnetic fields are present and can be coupled to for splitting the fields. Cobalt magnets run between 0.8 T to 1.1 T and should work for NMR Proton tilting easily. A cylinder rich in cobalt would need nothing more then to be magnetized horizontally Bh, and have opposing magnets at the correct Tesla rating Bv. There would be no need to have electric flow induced prior to tilting the Proton field. The entire disc could reach total saturation in both planes of quadrature magnetization. Two magnets of slightly different strength one as Bh and one as Bv a little weaker could be glued together or on opposite sides of a thin cylinder and spinning may be all that is needed to split the fields. Rows of these could be arranged around a cylinder of sphere, truly the simplest method I have found as of yet. Charging the Horizontal magnet with a negative HV would encourage a Neutron split.

Disc size:

As to how disc size will effect the process lets consider a simple formula for angular momentum

L = MVR

Particle Angular momentum = [Mass] times [Velocity] times [Radius]

This may represent the momentum imparted to a Proton or Electron setting within our disc.

We see that as we increase [Mass] [Velocity] or [Radius] we get a multiplying effect of the other two on the angular momentum . Increasing the disc radius can increase the effects of momentum on the outer layer of the disc by several magnitudes. We have no control over the mass of a Proton [1.6726231·10-27 kg]. We can however effect both the [Velocity] or RPM and the [Radius] of our disc. The suggestion in this formula is not to build our spinning disc too small, rather as large as practical. As the angular momentum of our disc will be coupled into the Protons angular momentum when they are sitting in alignment within a magnetic field, the higher we go the better. This is a coupling of angular momentum, and is not a coupling of magnetic spin frequency per say. Whatever momentum we are able to add will tend to spread our force window wider as Protons will be effected 1836 times more then Electrons. The difference must exceed the magnetic bond between Proton and Electron magnetic fields as well as the Electrons momentum alone.

Ref    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html  [Angular momentum of a particle]

Further if we consider the moment of inertia and apply it to a rigid spinning object [this is for reference and probably will not apply to just our particle]

I = mr ^2

Moment of inertia [I] = mass times the radius squared

L = I x w

Angular momentum [rigid object] = Moment of Inertia  times Angular Velocity

From these two formulas we see a similar multiplying effect of [Velocity] [Radius squared]

Ref    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html [Angular momentum] [Moment of Inertia]

It is noteworthy that doubling the radius of our disc should increase the angular momentum by a factor of around 4, reducing the RPM necessary by the same factor.

The larger the disc and the higher the RPM the wider the "force window" to reach critical threshold. Further to decrease the disc radius will require our 90 degree magnets to more precisely find the exact window where Electrons tilt and Protons do not tilt.

A Basic Smith coil:

Experiments with a coil similar to what Wilbert Smith described early on have shown the appearance of a 90 degree magnetic field. This field can be measured with a compass and produces one magnetic pole pointing outwards from the coils sides and the other pole appears inside the coil protruding from Both top and bottom ends. This seems to result from the coil canceling the normal Electron generated magnetic field.
The early description stated a coil wound such that each winding  reverses the field from the ones next to it.
Winding this coil on an aluminum tube produces the 90 degree field, and when stimulated with frequencies between 100 Khz to 2 Mhz produces a field that seems to interact with the nervous system of the human body. It can be sensed. It also is said to possess a conscious component when connected into the human brain.

Construction:
The coil was very simple and could easily be wound in a few minutes. I used about 12 feet of number 24 gauge insulated hookup wire forming only one layer. Starting at the center of the wire I looped the first loop around the tube, then as each next loop was placed on I twisted the wire on two sides of the coil such that one wire runs back and forth down each side. This produces a very uniform scalar field along the surface of the sides of the tube where the effect is strongest. When I got to around 1/4" of the end of the tube I joined the wires into a very tight twist about 2 feet long for feeding the device and then cut off the excess wire. This tight twist produces a good noise immunity at high frequencies, well into the Mhz region without the need for shielded wire.

Since this coil is wound on either Bismuth, Aluminum, or Copper, it produces what I have theorized is a Proton magnetic field. As the windings bring the Electrons magnetic field into a state of contraction, or cancelling, the resultant tempic vectors simultaniously expand the Protons magnetic field in two dimensions. Since the Protons two magnetic spin components lie in parallel travelling coils to one another they do not operate the same as the Electrons, which both lie in opposition coiling directions.  This opposition is the reason for the normal ballooning of the magnetic field. This coil seems to be contracting the Electron field to a point where the Protons magnetic field then expands out beyond it.

The properties of this new magnetic field apearing at 90 degrees to the normal field is the first solid evidence I have seen to indicate an alternate type of magnetic field does truly exist. When this coil is built around a larger copper tube and quickly hit with higher current pulses, that field can be mapped using a compass.
It will be intresting to see if this magnetic field is the cold energy we have been searching for.


The Magnetic Monopole:

The magnetic monopole was observed by John Huichison during some of his levitation expierments.Using the above coil designs if we wrap a Smith type winding over a spherical surface, one of two things should result. Either the magnetic field will loose its return flux path and shut down. Or one pole of the field will turn inwards from the Protons into the Neutrons space and stay in the lower gravity area of the Nucleus.
If there is another density laying directly inwards then we would end up with a magnet having one pole in this density and its other pole in a higher density.
Here it would become a Monopole. Since both magnetic vectors move the same direction in the Protons magnetic field, it should act like a one way flow. Either becomming an outflow or an inflow depending on which pole we turn inwards. By toggeling the polarity we may be able to regulate the time spent in each state.
This sort of pulsing is reflected in almost all the devices studied to date. The Searl disc and the Sweet VTA are good examples that this model may be applied to.

With a monopole arrangement like this, it can be seen as a tempic pump, or a controlled flow of tempic vectors connecting between densities.The energy would be inexhaustable.

Comparing other devices:

It may now become evident that what Hutchisen may have found was a method of entraining both Proton and Electron frequencies, and tilting them towards 90 degree positions, using the correct frequencies crossing such that sums and differences matched NMR and ESR rates in different quadrature planes. He did send objects into another density, which completely vanished, as well as levitate objects. The other possibility is to push both into higher rates of angular momentum by applying aiding spin forces to both simultaneously, this would seem all but impossible without first decoupling the two magnetic forces to some extent.

The Sweet VTA takes on a new outlook as well. Aligning the Protons in a weak magnetic field. It would take only a small force at the correct frequency to tilt the Protons into two canceling positions while entraining the electrons to flip the full 180 degrees. We end up extracting the electrons accelerating energy, while neutralizing the Protons energy. The reverse momentum of electron would be seen as the cold electric energy, in this model. As with normal electric flows, electrons are always flowing within the atomic orbits of atoms where greater opposing momentum constantly counters them. Also noteworthy that the actual splitting may be happening within the copper wire rather then within the magnet. The coils do not make any sense whatsoever as to turns to voltage ratios. The correct 4 coils set up with proper alignment may be all that is necessary, magnet conditioning may be merely setting up the NMR or ESR frequencies to split the field in the copper atoms of the coils. The quadrature polarization may be working its way even down the wires to the load. This would require the electron current to be moving parallel with the magnetic field rather then at 90 degrees to it. This energy would be delivering two magnetic fields rather then one.

In the plasmas we seem to see an energy gain, where electrons are completely freed from atomic orbits for a time in the ionized path through the air.


The Scalar Bismuth core coil:

The Bismuth coil I have experimented with is about 3/4" hollow Aluminum tubes 1 1/4" long filled with Bismuth and wound with a Smith Coil which cancels the Electron induced voltages. However I have discovered the energy does not actually cancel but is reflected back into the Proton layer.
The scalar winding offers a mirror effect which allows a Proton - Proton interaction between two different inductive metals.

Induction effect:

We are familiar with the nature of induction with respect to Electron flow.

My version of induction, Electrons begin to flow through a medium like Coppers Electron shell. The flow is reflected back from the Proton layer as a countering force slowing the change of current. Inductance comes not from the iron core but from the magnetic Proton layer of the Copper itself. We see air coils offer inductance as well, and it is assumed that a coil in empty space would also offer inductance. Inductance is a function of the Copper itself operating between Electron and Proton magnetic forces which counter or attenuate one another lowering the energy in a circuit [back EMF].

Now in the Bismuth coil, we have set up a Proton interaction with another Proton layer in the Copper and a Copper Electron canceling layer. Any energy moving between the Bismuth Proton layer and the Copper Proton layer may pass through the Coppers Electron layer but will be canceled or reflected back in to the Coppers proton layer.

Bismuth is unique in that it offers a diamagnetic Proton magnetism that can be accessed outside or along the surface of its material base. It is this field in motion of it's own nature that is acting in the scalar coil and being reflected back into the Coppers Proton layer that is powering the Vortex generator.

The scalar coil is the link between Bismuth and Copper Proton magnetism. The regenerative building effect is happening between the Bismuth and Copper wire that has it's Electron field canceling. This is the true source of the interaction that is causing an energy envelope to pop out of the whole unit at approximately 3' diameter.

The surprise is that in the interaction of two inductive elements, pitting inductance against inductance does not create a degenerative effect but an over unity effect. The coil is self powered as long as the scalar winding is shorted. Opening the scalar coil halts the buildup of the field by allowing the Coppers Electron layer to form countering voltages that sink the energy.

Now with our coil we are hitting it with a diamagnetic field [Bismuth], and getting a counter field back at the Proton layer. So the Copper wire on the Bismuth core is a Proton - Proton magnetic interaction. This may be the effect we are seeing here.
Although a canceling coil tends to reduce Electron magnetism it seems to be doing something very different with Proton magnetism. It is actually forming an Electron energy mirror between the Proton layers of the Bismuth and the Copper where energy can flow between.
Placing the "South inwards" field along the coil is aligning all the Protons in the Copper and the Bismuth into the correct alignment for the Aether pumping diamagnetic effect which are jumping through the copper Electron shells.

The scalar Bismuth coil alone with winding shorted becomes the power source for the vortex generator of "Rain Maker 1" the first unit that I observed this effect in. It generates a field about 3' in diameter which builds on it's own over time and forms a "hot spot" in space which does not move when the generator is removed.

Hamel Cones:

Hamels concept of "mass into energy" would seem to apply to the Nucleus of atoms, where we see the Strong Force causing a similiar effect of mass into energy. Here we see the atomic weight of the Nucleus is reduced by a mass and becomes the Strong Force related to one another by E = MC^2. 

How is spin induced in Hamel cones?

The cones do not spin as we think of spin in a Searl disc, rather they vibrate, precess, or tilt, in little circles top and bottom. The vibration in the center cone moves in the same pattern found at the Nucleus of the atom in a magnetic precession, operating at several Mhz in the atom. This is called the NMR  [Nuclear Magnetic Resonance] frequency. Because the cones are interlocked, the top cones lower apex is moving in a small circle. The lower cones upper region is moving in a small circle with the same direction of spin but 180 degrees out of phase or tilt. The cone in the center is moving both top and bottom and couples to the Atoms Nucleus electrostaticly. The Nucleus of the atom is the heaviest part, and this coupling is a vibrational mass coupling of energy transmitted through the EM field between Protons and Electron shells. This is only possible because the cone is able to pass the Nuclear vibrations through its Electron mass structure, because it  is also floating in a magnetic field and free to vibrate in this same motion. As the vibrations pass between atoms they cause a coherent NMR to link throughout a section of the Aluminum. Once the device spin or vibration becomes coherent, the heavier Nucleus of all Aluminum atoms will want to align with it in the same spin plane, just as with a spinning disc. The Protons and Neutrons will be pressed to flip vertical and there precession will be the same as the center cone. Along the magnets at the rim of the cone the Protons will be held in  horizontal spin by the magnetic field and unable to flip upwards. At some point away from the magnets, as the magnetic field drops away, the Protons and Neutrons will be found tilting upwards, overpowering the magnetic field. This is the point or ring of vibrational threshold for step one. The NMR frequency will determine where this latitude is located along the cones mass and the physical vibration will be found to be a subharmonic of the NMR frequency along this one latitude. This process is identified as step one, and is the source of the cones motion or spin. It is the device motor.

In my current model, the two step process for tunning a Hamel cone would be these:

1 - Achieve the highest possible cone vibration resonance frequency through good design choices. [get the cones to vibrate]

2 - Split the magnetic fields by finding the resonant subharmonics that land the NMR frequency closer to the horizontal magnets.

How does the Hamel cone split the fields? 

The NMR frequency of Aluminum changes with the strength of the magnetic field it is setting within. Therefore as we move away from the horizontal magnet ring along the cones larger circular edge towards its tip, the NMR frequency drops with the magnetic field strength. In step one we cause one ring or latitude of the cone to enter a coupling with the Nucleus of the atoms and the cone starts to vibrate at some subharmonic frequency of the NMR frequency. There should be found that by increasing the compression of the field the cones are setting in, more then one rate of precession may be achieved, and the frequency of vibration should increase, moving the latitude of NMR closer into the magnetic field.  If we can get the NMR ring to move into the correct area of the magnetic field, then across some small region it should cause the Protons to tip up where the horizontal Electron generated magnetic field is at the correct intensity to cause the Electron and Proton fields to split inside the Aluminum atoms all the way down to the Neutrons. This is step two, quadrature magnetization.

At the place along the cone where the horizontal magnetic field ratio is correct, if the Protons have attained a strong vibrational coupling along this same latitude, the field should split tilting the Protons magnetic field vertical, breaking away from the Electrons horizontal field. Working its way into the Neutrons, as the field splits within the strong force area, energy flow begins outwards, now through a vibrationally coupled system, all the way to the Proton and Electron layer and the split begins to propagate throughout the cones. Negative electric force charges the sides of the cones surface and somewhere around the center point we could expect a positive charge to manifest. Control is with a vertically polarized magnetic field, said to gate the flow. However this magnet would tend to upset the sensitive balance between vertical and horizontal magnetic fields, in such a thin cone material, and rejoin the fields by overpowering them both in the thin Aluminum. 

The force window can be seen as getting the first NMR resonance to manifest on a cone latitude as close to the correct magnetic field area as near the magnets as possible. The vertical tilting force on the Protons, and the NMR coupling frequency latitude of cone mass to NMR frequency, must cross at the correct horizontal magnet strength to form a splitting area. If the two never come close enough then a cone that simply vibrates may never cross the threshold of splitting the fields and releasing Neutron energy. Getting the cones to vibrate is only the first step, this creates the vertical momentum force for Proton alignment. They must resonate an NMR subharmonic, with a mass physical vibration,  crossing the magnetic field at the proper intensity to create the split of Proton and Electron magnetic fields along one latitude, before it can spread. It would seem that strength and placement of the base and upper magnets may help support the vertical field, and more attention should be directed here as well. Being able to regulate the gating magnets strength may allow a sliding of the NMR ring latitude slightly up or down the cone to coincide with the proper distance from the horizontal magnets to begin the splitting process.

If the electron mass of the free floating cone can be vibrationally coupled to the vibrational rate of the nucleus at a subharmonic then nuclear Resonance should envelope the cones upper and lower areas where circles are widest. If we could build a cone such that its electron mass was equal to the mass of one nucleus this would vibrate up rather quickly. This small cone would have only around 3,813 atoms total and its total electron mass would be equal to the mass of one Nucleus. Having identical weight it would easily vibrate at the exact rate of the Nucleus and begin to couple the Nucleus vibrations between atoms. Growing larger requires a sub harmonically coupled vibrational rate. Lowering the magnetic field will help because it will lower the nucleus precession rate. This will not effect the coupling mass but it will allow for vibrating a heavier object more quickly at a lower harmonic.

These parameters are within our means to measure and to easily alter as well as to control. The Hamel cone is tunned through a laborious process of adjusting the opposing magnets floating distance, altering the stress holding the mass of the cone, thus its vibrational rate. However if the cone has not been, by chance, engineered to fall within a certain range, then no vibrations will surface. It would seem the cone in the center is the one that will emulate the atom most closely, as it circles both top and bottom.

A possible tunning method for Cones:

The NMR frequency can be determined mathematically for Aluminum for the magnets used and the distance they are at from the Aluminum, dropping off at an inverse distance cubed rate.  Two devices can be fabricated to measure both vibrational mass rate, and NMR rate.

Mass vibration sensor:

A section of the cone is polished to shiny. A laser light pen is connected to the frame and hits the cone reflecting off onto a calibrated piece of white paper, with a grid pattern and a photo sensor behind it with a small hole. Cone vibration is seen as a dot size increase, or a line width. If the paper is moved further away this will be amplified. A simple circuit can connect to a frequency counter that should read the frequency of vibration.

NMR sensor:

A coil is wound around the frame, outside the cone of about 30 meters of wire horizontally level. The length of this wire could be near the calculated NMR frequency wavelength. This could be wound on a separate form that may be removed. A second coil is placed inside the cone with vertical polarization as an NMR receiver. It must be near the center of the cone and have a shield around only its outer edge, not its side edges. It can be fitted with a tunning capacitor and set to resonate at the NMR frequency as well. A strong signal generator can now be used to scan the cones resonance. When the NMR frequency is stumbled on a simple RF field strength meter should show the cross coupling between the two coils as a sharp resonant peak, or a group of them appearing along the cone. This can be achieved with a diode and a voltmeter much like Hutchisens hand held unit. The positioning of this coil must be very accurately vertical and the connecting wires must be very short and shielded running to the meter that must have a shielded box. Or a radio receiver could be tuned using a CW receiver, and following the signal generators frequency.

As the cone is frequency scanned in this manner the vibrational rates of both "device resonance" and "nuclear resonance" should show on one of our sensors. Finding the rates and then altering parameters to tune them to cross at one frequency harmonic is the method for tuning in step one. A fully tuned magnetically floating cone may physically vibrate when the correct NMR frequency hits it, indicating that the cones electron mass has linked to the NMR vibrational rate. It should be determined how many frequencies this can be made to happen at, and how high we can run this frequency up. 

Magnet selection for Hamel cones:

All magnets are a combination of Proton and Electron magnetic fields, which have opposite spin momentum in the same field. The horizontal magnets running around the cones should favor Electron spin and avoid Proton spin. Proton magnetic spin carries with it a high mass momentum, Electron magnetic spin does not.
The best magnets to use for the horizontal field would be magnets with little or no Nuclear spin. Magnets with a high Nuclear spin like Cobalt will tend to resist the Proton tilt in the Aluminum slowing the splitting process. Ceramic ferrous [ferrite] magnets would probably be the best choice. Ideally the Protons in the Aluminum will be held by the Electrons magnetic field in the magnets we select and easily tilt away from it when the spin force becomes strong enough. Gating magnets aligned along the top and bottom of the device may be Cobalt or even Neo. However this may just as well inhibit shutdown and control.

An alternate method is suggested for building the cone magnets using Iron or Ceramic ferrite rings. An iron or ferrite ring can be very precisly magnetized by spinning it past very strong magnets at high RPM. A very uniform magnetic field will result. Spining the cones ring  past a neo magnet South pointing inwards will produce a uniform field in the iron with North pointing outwards. The reverse can be done with the stator ring. The setup for this would require a spining test jig able to spin the rings up either before they are atached to the cones, or spining the cones afterwards. The normal method of coil pulse magnetization produces the wrong shaped field for a Hamel cone, resulting in a North South vertical alignment like the Searl disc uses. Testing can be checked by slowly turning the ring and watching field strength from a stationary point. It should be very constant along the entire ring.

Once they are magnetized, stronger magnets must be kept away from them because iron can be effected quickly by Neo magnets touching them. Alternates would be to do this with a machined magnetic material or a molded ceramic and magnetized after assembly. This would ensure a uniform field. Piecing seperate magnets along the ring will produce a random intensity magnetic field and NMR may not find a complete circle around the cones. If seperate magnets are used then each one should be tested with a compass against the earths field to ensure a same distance reach is present where the compass is seen to move half way between the magnets force and the earths force.

Adjustments:

Adjustment of the magnetic compression screw should cross the two vibrations at several points, and the higher the better. Just because a cone vibrates, does not mean it will not vibrate at a higher, almost undetectable rate, if compressed further. The vibration sensor would be a valuable item to detect these higher rates and to peak them. Pushing the physical vibration rate higher up towards the 16 Khz limit of physical vibration may help. Nuclear vibrational coupling will be increased the closer the frequencies come to one another. The Aluminum NMR frequency may be setting at around  1 to 5 Mhz some inches off the horizontal magnets. A chart can be created to predict where the NMR rings would form and mapped onto the cones as a frequency. The cone must vibrate at a sub harmonic of the NMR frequency landing as close to the magnets as possible for splitting the fields.

An expiermental device for "splitting" in Aluminum:

Concept of operation:

4 coils are provided for individual control of Proton and Electron motions. Device is designed to find the correct parameters by allowing a large number of variables to be applied. The DC coils are outside the NMR coils so they will not interfere with the high frequencies hitting the sphere. No iron is to be used in the device, because the individual magnetic fields will be skewed or bent as they pass through iron. All the magnetic fields must converge in tact inside the Aluminum sphere. The outer DC coils fields will pass through the NMR coils because they are not Alternating fields, and will receive no inductance as they pass through them. However the DC coils will attenuate some RF from the NMR coils.

It is noted that silver wire would be better then copper wire because it has a much lower Nuclear spin and thus coils overlaying one another would offer much less induction interference to one another.

The Electron bias coil is provided to keep a strong Magnetic field in the horizontal plane reaching all the way to the Neutrons. The Proton trap bias coil is a slightly weaker field designed to catch the Protons as they are tilted vertical delaying them from returning for splitting. The NMR coils are set up to offer two planes of motion induction for the Nucleus, one will split the fields and the other will join them. The difference is achieved by reversing one coil polarity, rotating it 180 degrees in phase. Also other phases can be experimented with for various tilting angles if phase driving circuits are included.

Measurements are available with a compass, and a voltmeter. The core sphere should develop a voltage as with the Searl disc when the fields split, + at the center and - on the outer ring. Voltage taps are provided for drawing currents and large copper conductors should be used. The compass may be kept near the top of the vertical North pole, and slightly to one side. As NMR resonance is hit, this pole may be seen to spread tilting the compass slightly downwards no longer pointing to the exact center. This is because the lines of flux have found new paths through the Aligned Protons coherently through the material. If Aluminum wire is used to tap the voltage we may expect the field splitting to migrate up it and actually provide the cold electric effects. It is thought that by using copper the dissimilarity should stop the splitting from leaving the device.

The ultimate device would add the ability to spin the sphere, in the case that this may be the only way to get the Neutrons to seperate, since the inner Protons magnetic field seems to be totally hidden under the Electrons. The Neutrons magnetic moment is [ - ]. It is my assumption that since the Sweet VTA does not need a spining device, this expierment may be enough. I am expecting that since the orbital Protons are operating within the strong force area, tilting them will be enough to split the Nuetron forces.

If quadrature magnetization can be accomplished in Aluminum, I would expect a constant voltage electric force apearing, the sum of many electron volts alignedat atomic levels, and probably a function of the magnetic chain length or the diameter of the Aluminums solid parts. Thus sphere size may become important to voltage output, and thickness may be important to current capability.

Device 2 - Rolling the Proton field at an NMR frequency

There is one other method to split the magnetic fields that may prove intresting, requiring slightly more energy input. That of rolling the Protons field through a circle positioned 90 degrees to the steady Electron magnetic field. If it can be rolled at an NMR frequency then Protons and Nucleus of atoms will be spining in one field and the other field will cross it at 90 degrees. In this configuration the entire Nuclear mass of the splitting material is spining although the device is stationary at the electron layer and does not apear to move. With this method iron can be used in the electro magnets in the stationary field, so can be much closer and stronger. The NMR coils will be situated at 90 degrees to one another and fed 90 degrees out of phase setting up a rotating magnetic field at the NMR frequency or a sub harmonic, or even a short pulsed waveform, also setting just inside the stationary magnetic field.
Proton dipoles will be held in a constant state of circular spin, in a spin plane perpendicular to the Electron field. An Aluminum disc or cylinder could be used for this expierment.

The Nuclear Magnetic Resonant Battery is a similar device concept.
 

In the Nuclear Magnetic Resonant Battery or NMR Battery pulses are fed through a Copper tube or cylinder vertically. This creates a magnetic field pulsing around the inside of the tube at 90 degrees and causes the Protons to move into a magnetic spin, still precessing around the vertical magnetic field, but at 90 degrees to it. Because the Copper tube completely wraps the Aluminum tube all the Protons are effected at once and the device does not have to physically spin. When the Aluminum reaches Nuclear resonance at the full 90 degrees the fields split into the Neutrons. Noncancelling EM begins to appear along the surfaces of the Aluminum top and bottom [one voltage polarity] and sides [other voltage polarity].  The device is totally controlled electronically by the pulse amplitude and pulse length. If the pulses stop then the Protons slowly spiral back up into alignment with the vertical magnetic field and it should shut down. 

Magnets dropped through an Aluminum tube:

AluminumInductionGraphic
The picture of me dropping a stack of Neo magnets through an Aluminum tube, is one of David Hamel's demonstrations. The magnets seem to float down the inside of the tube because the entire weight of the Aluminum Nucleus must rotate as the magnets move through it. Since the mass is also spinning it resists having to turn.
 
One further experiment should be added to this to point out exactly where this interaction is happening. Drop a short Aluminum or Copper tube, a couple inches long, down a long string of  Neo magnets. You will discover that it only falls slower near the ends of the magnet, and falls freely down its center.
This does not mean that there is no magnetic field along the center of the magnet string. It only means that the angle of the flux lines are not changing.

Looking closer at the magnet floating down the tube, we see directly below the magnet an area in the Aluminum where random Nucleus angles are being aligned with the magnetic field. This area is a great resistance as all Proton spin is aligned first. Next we see the flux begin to roll as the lines cross a 90 degree point with the walls of the tube very near the magnets bottom end. This is a coherent roll of all the Protons in a ring around the tube together. Next we see the center of the magnet passing and there is no turning of the flux angle so little resistance is encountered as all the Protons are aligned and not turning. As the top end aproaches we see another coherent magnetic roll in the Protons before they are released back to random flipping motions. This adds one more drag at the other end of the magnet. This is why only the ends of the magnet are causing the resistance to motion. Another note worthy factor is the that as the magnet aproaches the Aluminum atoms their magnetic spin frequency is increased. As it move on by the frequency drops back down.

An important concept is seen here, in that if we have a material like Copper or Aluminum in a high speed rotation setting in a magnetic field, as long as the field is constant in shape, and the rotation is perfectly in alignment with the field, there should be no resistance after all the Protons are aligned. Only the spin up will cause a drag. This would require a very accurate alignment of magnetic field with device spin, but results in a coherent Proton magnetic field throughout the material offering no drag.

Searl disc:

The Searl disc is seen as 4 layers of materials. Center is Nb, and said to magically create electrons. Next layer is Teflon and said to gate electron flow outwards. Next is Iron with a vertical magnetic polarization as well as an AC signature at some RF frequency. Last the outermost layer is copper. Around this perfectly formed disc are the rollers which are basically the same only with their vertical field reversed so rollers are attracted to cylinder.
When in operation their is a negative voltage charge developing on the outer ring. Power can be taped off by small pickup coils placed above and below the rollers. as they pass through mid air they induce voltages into the Copper coils evenly from above and below.

Searl disc magnetization process:

Looking at the way the Iron Cylinder is magnetized we see an RF riding on top of a Static DC magnetic field. Since the RF programming winding is narrow and placed at the center of the cylinder its flux lines reach out crossing the DC field at nearly 90 degrees only along the upper and lower edges of the Cylinder. An RF wave pattern is imprinted into the Electron magnetic domains when the Main field is placed into the Iron cylinder. Looking at the microscopic level what we end up seeing is a quadrature alignment of magnetic domains in the Iron in these two areas. The edges are peppered with atoms in each alignment. Some align around the DC flux field and some around the RF flux field. As the RF field is reversing [AC] its flux is in motion moving out then in and intersects in quadrature only at two areas near the cylinder edges. These are the only place where they may remain stable after magnetic coils are shutdown because everywhere else they are not decoupled enough not to effect one another.  After magnetization these are locked in and act as little 90 degree magnets pointing straight outwards along the edges of the cylinders.

Operation:

As the rollers move by these they act like atom sized spokes, interlaced with both quadrature polarities, the Roller grabs the Cylinder and must spin to roll along it. As motion speed increases the Copper layers of rollers are moving through the Cylinders magnetic field and begin to generate the familiar magnetic repulsion no matter the polarity of the magnetic fields they encounter. The Copper layer is generating a cushion of repulsive magnetism that the Rollers float on.Where 90 degree magnets are encountered these swing the Proton fields to 90 degrees in the copper where splitting must be happening at a level that can convert mass into energy in the Neutrons. When Coppers Protons encounter the magnetic fields generated from the Iron they spin couple, and take on a repelling magnetic polarity, so the Protons start to fall into a magnetic pattern reflecting the Disc programming in the Iron only repelling in the magnetic field.
We see the same scalar forces inside the atom in the orbital process.

As to why the rollers do not fly off at higher speeds, this requires some thought. The attracting magnetic fields holding them at low speeds are not strong enough to hold the rollers onto the disc at high speeds. At some point the centrifugal force will exceed the magnets holding strength. There are two or three other explanations as to why the rollers would stay on at high speeds. Electrostatic attraction is one, if the rollers become negatively charged and the cylinder becomes positively charged. Another is the Strong force found in the Nucleus of atoms. If this force is expanding outwards to encompass the entire disc then at 137 times the magnetic field strength it would have much more ability to hold the rollers. Also the Proton tilts may be generating an inwards angular momentum along the surface between the cylinder and the rollers. As these 90 degree tilts are turning the mass of the atoms [the Nucleus] then at higher speeds they would provide more inwards torsion. Of corse another idea is that as the device lowers gravity then momentum drops along with it and the rollers actually weigh less so are easier to hold on. With all Mass in the device spining in a horizontal plane of motion there would be no momentum resistance to horizontal movements.

Source energy:

Lastly it is speculated that when RPM reaches a high enough spin it will become impossible to tilt Protons at all with the magnetic fields crossing at 90 degrees. It is at this point where the only field that will be allowed to turn is the electron with its far lower mass. The only Electron that is not device coupled, is the one setting inside the Neutron at the center of the atom, having only a very small part of its magnetic field protruding. If the pulsing magnets can reach this level, or if the negative potiential becomes strong enough, it may be this tilt that taps the strong force and begins to release Source energy.


Device 3 - Simplicity:


This device is the simplest that I can conceive to test the enclosed theories.
An Aluminum Cylinder mounted to a high speed electric motor with an insulated shaft.
A ring of high intensity magnetic coils are positioned around the ring as close as possible at 90 degree magnetic polarity.
A High Voltage power supply.

The goals are this:
1 - Align Protons and Neutrons vertically with spin momentum.
2 - Place a High Voltage Negative DC charge on the cylinder.
3 - Hit the Neutrons with a 90 degree high level magnetic pulse, causing it to partially split.

These should be under variable control:

RPM
DC voltage
Magnet coil strength, pulse width

The Hamel cone shows us that it may not be necessary to even pulse the 90 degree coil, if the magnetic field strength is correct.
The Searl disc shows us it may also be necessary to add a ring of magnets or a magnetized layer under the Aluminum, however this may only be necessary to replace the motor, as a high enough RPM will put the Protons where we want them.

Our target is the Neutron which has about the same magnetic moment as the Proton. The Neutron however has a negative magnetic moment which is a result of the shrunken Electron shell setting around it. This shell would have a very low mass and should tilt much easier then the Proton setting inside it so this is our target.
The NMR frequency of the Neutron is just up into the microwave range, setting up a microwave transmitter is not an easy idea, however we do not need to resonate the Neutron only split it's component fields. The Spinning disc should keep the Protons which are heavier locked in the vertical position, allowing the Neutrons Electron shell to tilt. Since in Copper or Aluminum the Nucleus has a non cancelling spin, there should be at least one Neutron with its internal electron field exposed. If we can snag this one and tilt it then we could expect to see a higher energy effect, then in messing only with the Orbital shells.

If we choose to add a vertical magnetic field to the Aluminum cylinder, it is important to get this field very well positioned. The magnetic fields N/S poles must be true to the motor shaft and not tilted or skewed in the least. A spining tilted Magnetic field will generate all kinds of spin resistance due to it's alternating intensities. A magnetic layer added on our cylinder must have a constant strength to any one stationary point. The reson this is so important is that we do not want Proton magnetism altering its spin angle as the disc turns.

As we expierment with RPM,  DC voltages, and Magnetic pulses, we are searching for a magnetic pulse that does not add inductive drag to the Aluminum. As soon as an inductive drag is apearing this means we have tilted the Proton field and are tilting Nuclear mass. The goal is to stablize the Nuclear mass of the Protons in the vertical position, and find the correct magnetic pulse that will reach the Neutrons negative magnetic moment, without tilting the Protons. The Nuetron will respond to far higher frequency pulses then the Proton also.



David Lowrance 

Public Domain Paper 03-15-06

 

Notes and NMR References:

Note 1

In AG work it is common to use values relevant to a 1 Tesla magnetic field, as many Neo magnets land between 1 and 1.5 Tesla. It is noteworthy to mention however that the precession rates [NMR and ESR frequencies] given in this paper are relative to 1 Tesla and these rates will be altered as the field is lowered or raised.

Note 2

It is also well know now that the particles Proton and Electron are not really particles, but energy in a wave looping function. However as they still possess the same measurable effects of magnetic moment and angular momentum, I have chosen to use the word particle to describe them.

Note 3

A mental image presented of the Roshin and Godin Russian Searl disc duplication may be an aid to understanding references in this paper, as well as a basic understanding of how NMR and ESR function.

http://www.cis.rit.edu/htbooks/mri/inside.htm

http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm

 

Other References:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magpot.html#c1

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magmom.html#c2

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/nmr.html#c1

 


Definitions:

Spin Plane - As an electron is seen in an orbit around the nucleus, any one complete circle lies within a single plane, or plane of motion. As the magnetic vector lies at 90 degrees to this it is important to have some way to reference the angle. This is similar to an electric coil, whose winding all lie approximately within one plane, and the magnetic field generated lies at 90 degrees to this plane. While the Electron eventually winds its way around the entire electron shell, its spin plane shifts, however if the atom is magnetic more of these spin planes align to form a greater field external to the atom along one spin plane. The electric spin plane is seen 90 degrees to the magnetic field and tends to contain more electron motion of one direction of spin.

EM - Electro magnetic force is 1/137 as strong as the strong force. EM is the force operating at the Electron layer, and between Protons and Electrons.

Strong Force - The force found at the nucleus of atoms where vortexes or particles are very close to one another. The Neutron is seen as an Electron vortex overlapping a Proton vortex such that spin is coupled and EM is canceled. In this tight configuration the strong force is dominant. It drops off just outside the nucleus and does not effect the Electron cloud. Strong force can only hold 83 Protons in a stable configuration. Bismuth is the largest stable atom.Within the strong force is a weight reduction where the total mass is lighter then the sum of its parts.

Nuclear - With reference to the unit at the center of an atom consisting of Protons and Neutrons which are tightly bound by the strong force. The major weight of the atom exists within this nucleus. The Electron shell is seen to exist outside the influence of the strong force, and operates only by electro magnetic force.

Proton - The Proton is seen generating the major magnetic force found in the nucleus of the atom, thus it is the coupling link between the atoms major mass and magnetism for atoms that do have a nuclear magnetic moment. Tilting the external magnetic field that is coupled to a Proton tilts its spinning mass rotation offering a resistance of momentum. The Proton is seen to spin the same direction of its orbital motion and as such offers a higher energy output then Electrons when magnetism and momentum are combined. Particle that spins CCW in a magnetic field, bound in the strong force at the nucleus of atoms.

Nucleon -  A paired Proton and Neutttttrroon found in the Nucleus of an atom

Neutron -  The combined Electron Proton vortexes that cancel their Electro Magnetic fields, and are bound in the nucleus by the strong force.

Electron - While described as a particle, the electron is really a quantum wave energy moving between densities. It is only in our density at very specific intervals of time or quantums where its force is felt like the spokes on a wheel as it spins. The importance is that we have identified its main measurable manifestations. That of magnetism, electricity, and radiation frequency as related to "angular momentum" and "magnetic moment." The electron spins opposite its magnetic moment. Electrons create a magnetic field some 600 times stronger then Protons with a mass over 1800 times lower.Particle that spins CW in a magnetic field, freely roaming the electron cloud and is not bound by the strong force

Quadrature - Forces that are linked together in a 90 degree relationship such that energy between angles of forces are linked. The electron set into motion creates a quadrature magnetic field. The Electrons spin on the quantum level partially creates the time flow rate [Wilbert Smith].

Quadrature magnetization - The theoretical state within an atom where Protons precess around one magnetic field, and Electrons precess around another magnetic field, such that both magnetic fields sit at 90 degrees to one another. Both fields sit in the blotch wall of the other. This may be a necessary transitional configuration to the creation of Neutrons, where both are seen to end up overlapping.

Density - A stable state of matter, one set of parameters where the atom is stable to interact with other matter at the same state.Our physical world is one such possible state, where atomic particles have found an equilibrium. The sages  through the ages have envisioned many more such worlds and named them. They indicate we are now on the 3rd leveled density of mater. Claimed Alien contact as well has suggested this model is accurate and moving into higher densities changes the relationships of momentum, gravity, and time flow rate.

Source - The sought after place where free energy is moving into this density and powering the atoms and all manifestations of energy found here. The regenerative source, or the root location of tapping that source of energy. I believe that Source will be located within matter, and is found at the crossing point of atomic particles entering and leaving this density.

Dipole - The quality of magnetic fields as they are created from electron motion to manifest two directions of force along its B vector. One labeled North and one labeled South. The earth has a magnetic South pole setting at its North Geomagnetic pole. The North pole of a compass, will attract to a South magnetic pole of a free magnet.

Blotch wall - The center point between the dipole ends of a magnet where almost no magnetic field exists with enough magnetic polarity to effect anything. Holding one magnet inside the blotch wall of another allows for the least interaction between them. Within atomic orbits that are more perfectly aligned spherically, this effect may lead to another stable state of atoms, once supporting magnetic fields are established.

Compass - The simplest most convenient way to detect a magnetic field, although often overlooked today as a tool of science. Caution is in order because if held too close to a Neo magnet may be completely reverse polarized if forced into a reverse field alignment. If using a compass it should be periodically checked against the earths field and realigned as needed using a neo magnet.


Reference constants and formulas:

Constants:

Planck constant: h     6.6260755·10-34 J·s

Proton mass energy equivalent:  1.503 277 43 x 10 -10  J             938.272 029  MeV

Electron mass energy equivalent: 8.187 x 10 -14  J                       0.510998 MeV [Me C^2]

Proton mass: 1.672621 x 10  -27 kg

Electron Mass: 9.109 38 x 10 ^ -31 kg                                 5.485 x 10 ^-4 u

Mass ratio Electron / Proton: 5.446 170 x 10 ^ -4

Mass ratio Proton / Electron: 1836.152

Proton g-Factor: 5.585

Proton magnetic moment: 1.410606 x 10^-26 J T^-1

Proton gyromagnetic ratio: 2.675 x 10 ^8 s^-1 T^-1         over 2pi   =   42.5774813 Mhz/ T^-1

Electron magnetic moment: -928.476 x 10 ^ -26 J T^-1

Electron volt-joule relationship 1.602 x 10 ^-19 J                 5.609 x 10^35 eV = (1 Kg)C^2

Joule-electron volt relationship: 6.241 x 10 ^18 eV = 1J

Proton Electron ratio: Ue / Up = 658.2106881

Electron magnetic moment: -9.2847701·10-24 J/T

Proton magnetic moment: 1.41060761·10-26J/T

NMR Formulas:

Energy of a photon E = h V       [h = 6.626x10^-34 J [Planks constant]]  [V = frequency]

Gyromagnetic ratio V = Y B      [Y = V / B]   [V = frequency [Hz]] [B = magnetic field strength [Tesla]] [Y = gyromagnetic ratio]

Transition energy  E = h Y B      [h = 6.626 x 10 ^-34]  [Y = gyromagnetic ratio]  [B = magnetic field strength]    [V is between 15 and 800 Mhz typically in medical apparatus]

Ionization potential for an organic molecule is 6 x 10 ^ -19 J

In NMR the energy in a photon is a function of its frequency times planks constant. For the photon to flip a nucleus magnetic field over this must equal the Transition energy. There is only one B field strength that can match any particular photon. Atoms setting all in the same magnetic field will easily exchange photons.


Home